Monday, August 06, 2007

A day of discipline.

The other day by accident I bought a 12 shot roll of film. I then set myself a goal of trying to sqeeze as many decent shots as possable onto the roll. It took four hours and about a mile and half walk, but I think I did my best in the end. Although as usual I still think I could have done better.
The first on the roll, ah yes Meat Par Excellence.

The second shot, a little skewed, but "cough" thats for artistic purposes.

Shooting colour over B&W, really has it's advantages.
Not often you see a panama hat in Dublin.
What the hell are these guys riding on.
This is not really a headless man but a hunchback.
The only dodgy shot on the roll, it's out of focus.
This kid looks twelve and smoking, little bastard caught me taking his picture as well.
If he was standing it would be a good picture as the light bulb would be on his head.
O'Connell Street.
Irish aid advert at the top of O'Connell street.
Well done to who ever took that original billboard picture it's fantastic.
The final photo of twelve.

So now back to the concept of unlimited use Flash cards, versus limited shots of film.

In this modern age the concept of of shooting 36 shots in groups at a time, is more and more becoming an alien concept. The idea now is shoot fucking hundreds and hundreds of shots till you get a "few" that are good.

What a pile of horse shit, any fucking pleb can pick up a digi cam, with auto focus, auto exposure, auto fucking everything, shoot hundreds of shots, and is bound by the sheer law of averages to hit something good. Unless they're very unlucky or very stupid (probably the latter).

I always use a metaphor that my Father says.
Shooting a digi cam with a zoom lens, loaded with a CF card that holds hundreds of shots, is like hunting deer in the woods with a machine gun. Sure it'll be easy to get a hit, you just spray everything in sight with bullets till eventually your bound to hit something. But whether or not any of your kills are clean or decisive ones is a different story.

While shooting a manual wind film camera, with a prime lens (preferably wide angle), is like hunting deer with a 45.cal bolt action rifle.
You have a very small magazine of bullets, and each time you need to take a shot you have to manually load each single shot. You have to stalk your prey with stealth, take into consideration every detail, and aim each shot ever so carefully. You have to focus and expose everything correctly.
And when you do hit something, it will be a clean and decisive kill.

Anyone can run around the woods machine gunning everything in sight, but they will never attain discipline or learn anything about the craft.
Thats the word I emphasize DISCIPLINE.

The idea for this little project came from when I was nerding it up at a camera repair place, talking to some some random guy. He spotted my rusted old F3 Nikon. He then comments so you haven't gone digital yet, I tell him I value my personal work too much to cheapen it by shooting fake ass digital.
He then proceeds to lecture me on the waste that film produces, especially in street shooting. He then informs me it takes hundreds of photos to get a good street shot with his D70.
Really hundreds of photos to get a decent photo, by the gods he really must be shit.
When you think about it there are guys who shoot 400 shots a day out there, that's over 10 rolls of film, I could not even imagine shooting 10 rolls and hardly not get anything.
If that's modern photography I want nothing to do with it.

I'm not saying I'm great, to tell you the truth I'm mediocre at the best of times, but at least on each roll of film there is 3 or 4 things of interest.

Besides I cheated a little on this photo project, because three of the locations I have used before except they were on Black and White and I wanted to see what they look like in colour.

So here they are to set my conscience straight.


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting attitude man, for sure. I'm now a fully converted digi snapper and have been for about 3 years. For the 18yrs before that I was 35mm and took a huge amount of photos in those years.

Now to me that doesn't make me any less of a photographer, doesn't make me any more or less skilled. To me it's the same as whether I shoot Nikon, Canon, 35mm or 6x6, with my left eye or my right.

Cameras are just tools yes? Sure digital has it's advantages (for me it's the free shooting and the 'enhancing' that can be later) and nowadays very few disadvantages compared to film.

I don't buy that whole "you can manipulate in digital" or "it's not a real photo, it's a cgi" cobblers, I mean you shot Velvia and get colours as Fuji dictate, Ektachrome gives colour as Kodak see it. And then there's the whole darkroom processing that modify the image as I might in Photoshop.

As far as comparing a digital camera to hunting with a machine gun? Erm I get the point, and my 10fps 1D Mark III sure qualifies as such but I know that I can't just shut my eyes and let it rip in full confidence that it can take a picture ?! C'mon mate, remember it needs to be aimed yes? Your .45 rifle could miss just as easy no?

And I'll suggest that there are plenty of shit photographs taken over the years on 35mm mate, and in my opinion all the increased memory card sizes mean is that there'll be more shit digital images clogging up the 'net and boring friends/family than ever before.

I will accept that I could follow you around Dublin and potentially take more photos than you might, but if you had 20 rolls with you and the mind to use them, why should I take more?

My feelings are that Digital has freed me from the cost constraints that 35mm has, so I can shoot as many shots of an event or subject as I choose to. My bike racing contract sees me shoot 2000+ a weekend although only 200 will get published. But that's something that 35mm would make scary to do. If I'm shooting a difficult subject I can bracket and see the results immediately which, no matter how good you are, is a bit of a guess on 35mm.

So I kinda agree with you in that just pointing and shooting, something that is definitely easier with digital, is not real photography but snapshooting. And people are free to do that.

But I disagree that this is something that digital has created. Man, remember the 110 format? Or the Kodak Disc cameras? Sheesh digital is something you should be grateful for mate. hehe.

Anyway, I still love the "Meat" shots no matter man.

Andrew-and-Seven.Deviantart.com

Anonymous said...

Call me old fashioned, but I still agree with Seamus.

I don't know what's the case of other photographers (specially professional photographers), but the feeling I have when I think I've taken a decent photograph, the uncertainty of the outcome... I just don't experience that with digital.

And yes, to a certain extent, I think that shooting film gives you a certain discipline. Curiously, it's not the first time I hear about discipline in photography. Nachtwey (although meaning something else) also talks about the "discipline of the frame".

Daniel said...

I just found your blog and am enjoying it. I shoot both digital and film (film- b & w mostly which I develop myself). I've found that the limited number of frames on a roll of film makes me slow down and actually think before firing away resulting in a better ratio of keepers to crap shots. I had an idea to buy several compact flash cards with only 16-36 mb! That way I would be limited with my digital, and hopefully get better images as I would have to pick and chose my shots more. The main problem with this project/idea, the smallest CF cards you can buy, when I was looking to do this which was over a year ago, is 128mb! And you probably can't even get one that small anymore. Sometimes bigger faster stronger isn't actually better.